🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 345+ reviews
Men βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Navy Men's Tactical Shorts

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.8 out of 5 (345 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$17.1
$28.5
Sale
βœ“ gratis delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Like latest shorts, worn twice and in remarkable condition.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
instantaneous Shipping
↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Navy Men's Tactical Shorts

Like brand-new shorts, worn twice and in magnificent condition.

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Men products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 367569

Category: Men > Shorts > Carpenter, Utility

Original Price: $28.5 USD

Sale Price: $17.1 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ gratis delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.8
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 9321 reviews
RH​
Ryan Hill βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Louisville, KY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
supreme decision
For the price, the Navy Men's Tactical Shorts works as described so no complaints. shipment was normal.
26 people found this helpful
SL
Stephanie Lewis βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Oakland, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Five stars!
In daily use, the Navy Men's Tactical Shorts performs as expected and I’m satisfied.
39 people found this helpful
EY
Elizabeth Young βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Chicago, IL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
So happy with this
After a few days, the Navy Men's Tactical Shorts works as described and it works for me. Works fine so far.
28 people found this helpful
MK
Megan King βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Omaha, NE
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
No complaints​
From my experience, it fits my needs so I’m okay with it.
13 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 weeks ago Β· Portland, OR
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding!
For the price, the Navy Men's Tactical Shorts works well enough and it’s fine overall.
13 people found this helpful